SoleOPS 3.13.0, ©2005-2018Solenovo Oy

Opintojakson toteutussuunnitelma

 Suomeksi 
GroupT26K15S/Degree Programme in Fine Arts (Tornio)
Study unitT301L85B Degree Specific Part, 5.00 ECTS credits, 133 h
Innomarathon
PROFESSIONAL STUDIES
ImplementationPerustoteutus/16001
UnitMinerva (Kauppakatu 58) Tornio
Time of implementationSpring2/2016-2017
Responsible teacher
Other teachersArkko-Saukkonen Anitra, Koivumaa Joonas, Lauri Jukka, Vuokila Johanna
Status of implementationFinished

Description status Ready
  
Language of instruction Finnish
Starting and ending dates14.03.2017 - 29.05.2017
Minimum number of participants  
Maximum number of participants  
Enrolment period01.09.2016 - 30.09.2016
Implementation method
Virtuality 0 ECTS credits
R&D integration 0 ECTS credits
Resit dates of the exam
Koulutuksen aikataulu (www-linkki)
Description language English 
Objectives

Student gets to know different business fields special features, and learns how to develop new business ideas using innovation methods. Students learn to act as a team member, and produce new ideas, and new business concepts.

During the course will be used various innovation methods, like De Bono – hats, six sigmas and Opera. Source material is focusing to creativity, to formulate understanding what is creativity, and how creativity can be used in business. Students will form a group of 4-5 people, and study the task to innovate and develop new ideas.

.

 
Assessment criteria  
Pedagogical arrangements

Course have seminars, supervised and independent teamwork-tasks, and student individual work.

Team is responsible by itself to organize weekly meetings!!! (when, where, and how)

Material

All material in Innomaraton 2017 - Moodle environment.

Content
Assessment

Assessment (numerical assessment scale 1-5, criteria, and feedback)

Excellent 5: Students has concentrated for discussing and analyzing the essence of given task. They have analyzed given task from various viewpoints, and all important areas are considered carefully. Presentations are implemented well, and they flow in logical way. Study group is able to show that they have unique and personal ideas for the case. They know how to use innovation methods, and have been using them various ways. They have used references, and references souces are marked correctly.

Good 4-3: Students has studies the topic and the case. Topic is handled well, and most important areas of the topic having been taking in consideration. Some of the results of the innovation process are irrelevant. Presentations are logical, but missing some issues. Students are able to show personal interpretation of the case issues, but not all aspects are handled, or understood.

Satisfactory 2-1: Students presents innovation results as a lists, direct references, or as a referenced idea, but try to bring some of their own ideas with. Some important areas of the case are not took into consideration at all. Sources of references are inadequate or are missing totally. Students have the basic information of the case, tools and reference material, but deeper analyzing is insufficient. Presentation are not logical, and there is no effort used for them.

Failed: Necessary reports are undone, and student or student group has not participated to mandatory seminars or lectures. Presentation is not ready in duedate, and student or student-group dont participate to final presentation (day).

Feedback of the course is given in soleops

Participation to seminars, and lectures is mandatory/compulsory. Students has to participate 100% to every seminar and lecture. If student is absent, s/he has to deliver a certificate from school nurse. Reports must follow given instructions. Participation to presentation is mandatory to everyone, in order to pass the course.

Overall assessment: working in teams and assessment of innovation result, taking in the consideration of teacher assessement, case author assessment, self-assessment and peer-assessment.

 Suomeksi